When Did Law-Breaking Become Acceptable?
I am astounded the direction society is taking in general. It would seem that over the last few years, no matter what the law is that is being broken, there are people out there who write comments accepting the fact that laws are broken.
Society is built upon having laws in place for protection of the general population. Every time a law is broken, it is going to cost one, or many their money, time, or life.
One example is illegal immigration. Illegal immigration is not the same as legal migration into the country - people take the time to file the necessary paperwork to become legal occupiers of the country. If you simply “arrive”, and take no action to do the paperwork, it is illegal, regardless of the reason. It is “undocumented” - another way of saying illegal. But there are those out there, including the media, who says that if you are against “illegal immigration”, you are against migration into the country. The media is understood - they only want to stir up people for more sales - there is no longer any unbiased reporting that I have seen.
Another example is Komen. If I run a business that finds itself involved with another company who is under investigation, regardless of the reason, I am going to reconsider my relationship with that company. That is simply good business practice. But the media jumped on it so quickly, as did the bloggers who want their name back up there in the limelight for their 15 seconds of fame, to stir up and insert “facts” before even giving the accused an opportunity to explain. It’s all politics it was said.
Before you jump, think about this. The Congress has done many things that you really have no control over. So, do you want to be involved with an investigation by this Congress, (”guilt by association”), against a company you are involved with? Especially if you are a charity and have to reply on the public for your funding? Does it matter why Congress is investigating? If so, why not go after Congress? Seems that the public hooraw was a bit misguided by the media.
And then you have Congress. There are 535 people who basically run the country, or so they say. They have exempted themselves from all of the laws every other citizen in the US is required to follow, including race relations, discrimiination, pay, taxes, and so forth. Just take the time to check it out. They commit violations of laws including misdemeanors and felonies that would normally keep the average citizen from getting a job ever again. How many in the Congress have a record, but still manage to keep public office so they can keep making more laws that affect you but not them? Just saying.
And then there are the gangs cropping up all over the place. We know the stories. “I shot him and killed him because he disrespected me” (Ironic - no respect for life). If every person who “disrespected” another person was suddenly gone, how many people would be left? To give you some idea, just look at comments people write on news articles for 2 days. My problem with them is if they act that way in real life, then there are some really bad people out there with no respect for themselves or others. And of course they do not post under their real names. That would be too embarrassing and revealing.
So my point is this. If society does not stop to take the time to reconsider what is acceptable, stop listening to all of the groups who have their own agendas, ignore the media, stop using the Internet as absolute gospel truth, and make up your own mind and moral compass, things are going to get much worse.
You’ll have much more “suddenly enraged”, “rampant anger”, etc. Oh yeah, sorry, thats the media talking again.